Sex, but...not
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:28:42 -0700 (MST)
From: J B Bell (cipher@eschatek.com)
To: zee-list
Subject: Re: sex, but...not
On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Sean B Regan wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 1997 14:16:00 -0600 Amadaus writes:
> >johnny *** wrote:
> >
> >> What if i asked more specifically about male/female energy exchange
> >>in an intimate fashion without intercourse?
>
> i've always liked the idea of locking eyes and matching breath w/someone
> and trying to switch bodies w/ them. this has always seemed like a very
> idea...
>
> anyone ever tried it? (w/ or w/out drugs.)
>
> -f
That's how my fiancee and I first did some serious magick together. I
found that the matching breath, accompanied by a very gentle swaying back
and forth (we were nude, sitting, facing each other, with our palms and
feet touching), and locking eyes spontaneously produced the effect of
body-switching, though I stress the effect, while very dramatic, was not
total. This was probably made easier by the fact that she and I had both
had dreams where we were someone of the other sex.
While it was not intercourse, and the contact we had was technically
nonsexual, we both later admitted it had been a HUGE turn-on. I suffered
waves of pleasure, quite orgasmic, a bit like a hashish trip. I don't
recall that we had a magickal "goal" in mind other than to experiment.
Neither of us was on drugs at the time.
I can only imagine it would be astoundingly intense if it were enhanced
by an entheogen such as LSD, though a very high dose of hallucinogen
might impair the concentration required.
All in all, most worthwhile, and I recommend it, if you can find a
suitable partner. This way lie other tantric practices, which I hope to
add to my magickal armamentarium.
--JB
Rev. J B Bell | Eschatek | ____
cipher@eschatek.com | Tools & Technologies | \bi/
http://www.eschatek.com/~cipher | for a Doomed Planet | \/
PGP fingerprint: B8 66 BC 4A C7 EA 66 B1 6B E8 EE 10 04 E0 36 D0